In a groundbreaking legal development, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, a pivotal law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in programs or activities receiving federal funding. The lawsuit, Texas v. Becerra, has the potential to significantly alter the landscape of disability rights, particularly within public education and special education services.
What Is Section 504?
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act is a federal law designed to protect students and individuals with disabilities from discrimination in educational settings and other programs receiving federal assistance. Unlike the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which guarantees specific educational services for students with disabilities, Section 504 provides broader protection by ensuring accessibility and non-discrimination in programs and activities, even for students who may not qualify for special education services under IDEA. This includes students with conditions like ADHD, chronic health issues, and learning disabilities, who may not be eligible for an IEP but still require accommodations.
The Texas v. Becerra Case
The lawsuit filed by Texas challenges the federal enforcement of Section 504 protections in educational settings. If the case is successful, it could strip away essential protections for students with disabilities, particularly those not covered under IDEA. This would significantly impact special education programs, potentially leaving thousands of students without legal recourse for necessary accommodations and support services.
At the heart of the case is the argument that Section 504 infringes on states’ rights and should not mandate specific provisions for students with disabilities. The Texas government argues that compliance with federal regulations under Section 504 imposes undue burdens on the state, particularly in regard to how educational services are administered for students with disabilities.
Why Does This Matter?
The outcome of Texas v. Becerra could have profound consequences for special education programs nationwide. If the courts side with Texas, the decision could set a precedent for further restrictions on federal protections for individuals with disabilities in educational environments. Students with disabilities could lose access to vital accommodations, such as extended test times, modified curricula, or assistive technologies, which are essential for their academic success.
For parents, educators, and administrators, this case highlights the need for vigilance in protecting the rights of students with disabilities. A ruling against Section 504 could undermine the significant progress made in ensuring that all students, regardless of their disabilities, have equal access to quality education.
What’s at Stake for Special Education?
The potential consequences of this case are far-reaching. If Section 504 is weakened or overturned:
Students with disabilities may face increased barriers to receiving essential accommodations.
Educators may have less support in providing the services required for students to succeed.
School districts may face uncertainty in how to manage compliance with federal disability law.
Looking Ahead
As this case progresses, it’s critical for special education advocates and stakeholders to stay informed and engaged. The future of special education protections hinges on legal challenges like Texas v. Becerra, making advocacy for inclusive education and disability rights more important than ever.
For a detailed breakdown of the legal case and its potential implications, read the full article by David Bateman on SPED LAW BLOG: Texas v. Becerra: The End of Section 504.
February 15, 2025
Texas v. Becerra: A Landmark Case Challenging Section 504 Protections for Students with Disabilities
Other Articles from the 02/28 Newsletter